Summary

Visual nasties are a growing concern in our digital landscape. They can take many forms, from cyberbullying and online harassment to deepfakes and other types of manipulated media.These visual nasties can have serious consequences, including emotional distress, anxiety, and even long-term psychological damage.

It's essential to acknowledge the harm they cause and work towards creating a safer online environment.By understanding the impact of these visual nasties and the ways in which they spread, we can take steps to mitigate their effects. This includes promoting digital literacy, holding social media platforms accountable for theiole in spreading misinformation, and supporting mental health initiatives.

Summary

On this topic while ensuring no kittens are harmed.Discussion Points:1. The impact of deepfake nudes on mental health and well-beingr 2.

Social media platforms' responsibility in regulating deepfake contentr 3. The role of education and awareness in preventing deepfake-related harmSummary:The Thorn survey highlights a pressing concern: most kids are aware that deepfake nudes can be harmful.

This suggests a growing understanding of the issue, but also underscores the need for continued education and support.Deepfake nudes can have severe consequences, including emotional distress, anxiety, and even long-term psychological damage. It's essential to acknowledge the potential harm these images can cause and work towards preventing their spread.Social media platforms must take responsibility foegulating deepfake content.

This includes implementing robust moderation tools, increasing transparency around algorithmic decision-making, and collaborating with experts to develop effective counter-measures. By working together, we can reduce the spread of harmful deepfake content and promote a safer online environment.

Summary

R The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Grindr, a popular dating app, citing Section 230 immunity. The plaintiff, who was misclassified as an adult on the app, brought various claims against Grindr, but the court dismissed all except for a federal civil sex trafficking claim.

The ruling affirms that online services cannot be held responsible for publishing harmful user-generated content. While this decision may seem to shield platforms from liability, it also highlights the need foeevaluating our approach to defamation and holding perpetrators accountable in the digital age.