Articles with #StopSurveillanceState

Showing 2 of 2 articles

Advertisement

Deeplinks on in internet
#PrivacyUnderAttack #DigitalRightsInDanger #EFFector37 #StopSurveillanceState #ProtectYourDataNow #HumanRightsInTheAgeOfTech #OnlineFreedomFighters #Section702Exposed #MetaMonopolizingYourData #AppleBetrayingTrust #CivilLibertiesInPeril #TechForDemocracy #FreeSpeechMatters #OnlinePrivacyIsAHumanRight #StopGovernmentOverreach

Discussion Points

  1. Apple's Decision to Turn Off Advanced Data Protection in the UK: What are the implications of this decision on user privacy, and how can individuals protect themselves from potential data breaches?
  2. Limiting Meta's Ability to Collect and Monetize Personal Data: Is it effective in limiting data collection, or does it create more vulnerabilities for users? What are the long-term consequences of such measures?
  3. Government Spying on Americans via Section 702: What are the implications of this victory for human rights, and how can individuals protect themselves from government surveillance?

Summary

The EFFector newsletter highlights recent threats to online privacy and free expression. Apple's decision to turn off Advanced Data Protection in the UK raises concerns about user safety.

A guide is available on limiting Meta's data collection, but its effectiveness is debated. The EFF victory against government spying via Section 702 is a significant human rights win.

The newsletter provides updates, announcements, and stories on protecting online privacy and free expression. Subscribers can access future editions directly in their inbox or through the audio edition on the Internet Archive or YouTube.

EFF is here to keep you up-to-date with the latest news in the world of civil liberties and human rights online with our EFFector newsletter! This edition of the newsletter covers Apple's recent decis...

Read Full Article »

Deeplinks on in internet
#OPMExposed #DOGEgate #MuskProblems #PrivacyRights #TechAccountability #SecurityFail #CryptocurrencyRegulation #DigitalPrivacyMatters #HackingExpos #CybersecurityLaw #TechIndustryWatchdog #FinancialRegulatory #StopSurveillanceState #ProtectYourDataNow #EndTheSurveillanceState

Discussion Points

  1. Privacy Act of 1974: The lawsuit argues that the OPM's disclosure of sensitive information to Elon Musk's DOGE violates the federal Privacy Act, which was enacted to limit the collection and surveillance powers of the government. What are your thoughts on the role of privacy laws in regulating government actions?r
  2. Data Protection and National Security: How do you think the OPM's actions relate to national security concerns? Should government agencies prioritize data protection over transparency and public access to information?r
  3. Whistleblower Protection and Labor Rights: The lawsuit is filed on behalf of labor unions and current/former government workers. What implications does this have for whistleblower protections and labor rights in the federal workforce.

Summary

A coalition of privacy defenders, including EFF and labor unions, has filed a lawsuit against the OPM for disclosing millions of Americans' private data to Elon Musk's "Department of Government Efficiency." The complaint alleges that the OPM's actions violate the 1974 Privacy Act, which limits disclosure of sensitive records without consent. This case raises concerns about government data protection, national security, and whistleblower protections.

The plaintiffs seek to stop further data disclosures and have existing data deleted. As a nation's largest employer, the OPM holds vast collections of sensitive personal data, making this case a significant test of privacy laws.

Lawsuit Argues Defendants Violated the Privacy Act by Disclosing Sensitive Data NEW YORK—EFF and a coalition of privacy defenders led by Lex Lumina filed a lawsuit today asking a federal court to st...

Read Full Article »