The group is using the Medusa malware and taking up space once held by other notable ransomware groups like LockBot, increasing its victim list to 400 and demanding astoundingly high ransoms....
Read Full Article »Articles with #Law
Showing 4 of 4 articles
Advertisement
Taylor Swift Ticket Thieves Charged in Court for Resale Operation
The pair found a loophole through StubHub's services, allowing them to steal tickets and resell them for personal profit, amassing hundreds of thousands of dollars....
Read Full Article »Utah Bill Aims to Make Officers Disclose AI-Written Police Reports
Discussion Points
- Regulation vs. Transparency: Should the primary focus be on regulating the use of generative AI in police reports or prioritizing transparency and public awareness about its potential risks and limitations?
- Accountability and Human Agency: Can AI-generated police reports ever truly account for human agency, and if not, how can we ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions and words in such reports?
- The Dark Side of Technological Advancements: Are the benefits of using generative AI in policing worth the potential risks and harms, particularly when it comes to exacerbating issues of bias, mistrust, and Orwellian surveillance?
Summary
A Utah bill, S.B. 180, would require police departments to disclose if reports were written by generative AI.
While this is a necessary step, it's not enough to address the concerns surrounding AI-generated reports. The technology's limitations in accurately processing language, nuances, and context pose significant risks, particularly in high-stakes settings like traffic stops.
Furthermore, the lack of transparency and oversight around these tools enables potential biases and abuses. As cities push back against their use, it's essential to consider the broader implications and strive for more robust regulations and public awareness to mitigate these harms.
A bill headed to the Senate floor in Utah would require officers to disclose if a police report was written by generative AI. The bill, S.B. 180, requires a department to have a policy governing the u...
Read Full Article »Advertisement
California Law Enforcement Misused State Databases More Than 7,000 Times in 2023
Discussion Points
- Accountability in Law Enforcement: How can agencies ensure that their employees are held accountable for misuse of sensitive databases like CLETS? What consequences should be implemented for such violations?r
- Database Security and Oversight: What measures can be taken to prevent misuse of databases like CLETS, and how can states like California improve their oversight and transparency mechanisms?r
- Civil Liberties and CLETS Misuse: How does the misuse of CLETS data impact civil liberties, particularly in regards to immigration enforcement and personal vendettas? What implications do these actions have on trust between law enforcement and communities?
Summary
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LACSD) has been accused of wholesale abuse of sensitive criminal justice databases, violating a specific rule against searching the data for concealed carry firearm permits. A report by EFF revealed 6,789 abuses by LACSD, with 24 officers suspended, six resigning, and nine fired.
The California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) contains sensitive information, and its misuse can have severe consequences. EFF has compiled data on CLETS misuse from 2019 to 2023 for public download.
California agencies are required to report misuse to the state Justice Department by February 1, but follow-up often takes several months.
The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LACSD) committed wholesale abuse of sensitive criminal justice databases in 2023, violating a specific rule against searching the data to run background ...
Read Full Article »