Articles with #JusticeForSurvivors

Showing 2 of 2 articles

Advertisement

TechCrunch on in tech
#CSAMGate #CreatorMonetizationMistakes #PlatformAccountability #ExploitedCreators #DigitalAgeResponsibility #SocialMediaSafetyFirst #CSAMDistributed #PassesPlatformsLawsuit #OnlyFansComparison #ContentModerationFailures #CreatorProtectionAct #TechIndustryReform #UserGeneratedContentRegulation #JusticeForSurvivors #ProtectingMinorsOnline

Discussion Points

  1. r.
  2. The information provides valuable insights for those interested in environment.
  3. Understanding environment requires attention to the details presented in this content.

Summary

Passes, a platform for creators to monetize their work directly with fans, has been sued after allegedly distributing Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). This move raises concerns about the effectiveness of its moderation policies, which prohibit nude photos and videos.

In contrast, competitors like OnlyFans have more lenient guidelines.The lawsuit highlights the challenges faced by platforms in balancing freedom of expression with the need to protect vulnerable users. Experts argue that no system is foolproof, and mistakes can have severe consequences.As the digital landscape evolves, it's essential for platforms to reassess their moderation policies and invest in robust AI-powered detection tools to prevent the spread of CSAM content.

This will require collaboration between creators, platforms, and law enforcement agencies to ensure a safer online environment.

Passes, a direct-to-fan monetization platform for creators backed by $40 million in Series A funding, has been sued for allegedly distributing Child Sexual Abuse Material (also known as CSAM). While i...

Read Full Article »

Deeplinks on in internet
#NinthCircuitRules #DatingAppImmunity #Section230 #Grindr #DoeVsGrindr #SexTraffickingClaims #FreeSpeechVsResponsibility #OnlineHarms #PlatformAccountability #TechLawUpdates #CourtRulingsMatter #DigitalRights #OnlineSafetyMatters #JusticeForSurvivors #ProtectingThe

Discussion Points

  1. Balancing Free Speech and Liability: How can online platforms balance their responsibility to protect users from harm with the need to preserve free speech and avoid censorship?r
  2. Section 230 Immunity: A Double-Edged Sword: Can Section 230 immunity be used as a tool for holding perpetrators accountable, or does it ultimately shield them from liability?r
  3. Redefining Defamation in the Digital Age: How can we reevaluate our understanding of defamation and its application to online platforms, considering the rise of user-generated content and social media.

Summary

R The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Grindr, a popular dating app, citing Section 230 immunity. The plaintiff, who was misclassified as an adult on the app, brought various claims against Grindr, but the court dismissed all except for a federal civil sex trafficking claim.

The ruling affirms that online services cannot be held responsible for publishing harmful user-generated content. While this decision may seem to shield platforms from liability, it also highlights the need foeevaluating our approach to defamation and holding perpetrators accountable in the digital age.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit correctly held that Grindr, a popular dating app, can’t be held responsible for matching users and enabling them to exchange messages that led to real...

Read Full Article »