GPT-4.5 offers marginal gains in capability and poor coding performance despite 30x the cost. ...
Read Full Article »“It’s a lemon”—OpenAI’s largest AI model ever arrives to mixed reviews
Discussion Points
- r
- Ethical Considerations: Is it morally justifiable to prioritize financial gain over the well-being of researchers and developers who rely on the funding for their work?r
- Responsibility and Accountability: Should organizations and individuals be held accountable for the consequences of developing and deploying AI systems with subpar performance, potentially leading to unforeseen outcomes?r
- Investment in Research vs. Short-Term Gains: Is the pursuit of marginal gains in capability worth compromising on coding performance and potentially hindering the advancement of the field as a whole?
Summary
R The release of GPT-4.5 has sparked concern over its substantial cost and disappointing performance. Despite 30 times the investment, the new model's capabilities remain only marginally improved.
This raises questions about the prioritization of financial gain oveesearch integrity and the potential consequences for developers, researchers, and users. The focus on short-term gains may compromise the long-term prospects of AI development, hindering progress in more critical areas.
A reevaluation of investment strategies and code quality is necessary to ensure that AI advancements align with ethical standards and benefit society as a whole.