Articles Tagged: statutory damages

Showing 2 of 2 articles tagged with "statutory damages"

Advertisement

Discussion Points

  1. The role of open licensing in promoting cultural sharing and preservation.r
  2. The impact of copyright laws on the free dissemination of creative works.r
  3. The importance of transparent and flexible licensing frameworks for artistic and educational content.

Summary

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is upgrading its website license to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, emphasizing the importance of open licensing in building a shared culture. By using open licenses, creators can ensure their work is widely distributed while retaining control over certain rights.

This shift highlights the need for flexible and transparent licensing frameworks, particularly in light of draconian copyright laws and penalties. The EFF's decision underscores the value of open licensing in promoting cultural sharing, preservation, and education, while also acknowledging the complexities and challenges associated with navigating copyright regimes globally.

At EFF, we’re big fans of the Creative Commons project, which makes copyright work in empowering ways for people who want to share their work widely. EFF uses Creative Commons licenses on nearly all...

Read Full Article »

Discussion Points

  1. Balancing Copyright Protection with Free Speech: Discuss the tension between protecting intellectual property rights and allowing for free speech and creative expression online.
  2. The Impact of Broad Copyright Laws on Small Creators: Explore how overly broad copyright laws can stifle innovation and creativity among small creators, researchers, and journalists.
  3. The Role of End User License Agreements in Shaping Online Behavior: Analyze the influence of EULAs on users' behavior and the potential consequences for free speech and transparency online.

Summary

The current state of copyright law poses a significant threat to free speech and creative expression online. The fear of financial retribution can silence would-be speakers, even if their use is deemed legitimate.

This has led to researchers being intimidated into silence, and small creators being stifleed by overly broad laws. The imbalance of power between authors and mass media owners perpetuates a system that prioritizes the interests of the powerful over those of marginalized voices.

It is essential to reconsider the draconian nature of modern copyright law and strike a balance between protecting intellectual property and preserving free speech.

If you’ve got lawyers and a copyright, the law gives you tremendous power to silence speech you don’t like. Copyright’s statutory damages can be as high as $150,000 per work infringed, even if n...

Read Full Article »