Articles Tagged: fair use

Showing 4 of 4 articles tagged with "fair use"

Advertisement

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. Balancing Intellectual Property Rights with Innovation: Should developers be required to obtain permission slips to read and train on copyrighted materials in order to create innovative AI models, or would this hinder the progress of beneficial technologies?
  2. The Impact on Socially Valuable Research: How would licensing requirements for fair use of AI training data affect the conduct of socially valuable research, such as scientific studies and text and data mining methodologies?
  3. The Role of Competition in AI Development: Would limiting access to training data through licensing requirements stifle competition in the AI development industry, leading to higher costs and reduced innovation?

Summary

Requiring permission slips to read webpages or use software assistance to comprehend digital content threatens the creation of beneficial AI models. This could hinder socially valuable research, such as scientific studies and text and data mining methodologies, by making it prohibitively expensive or impossible.

Licensing requirements would limit competition in the AI development industry, leading to higher costs and reduced innovation. Empirical evidence suggests that countries protecting text and data mining research from copyright control have more common research using these methodologies.

The stakes are high, as ML is critical to understanding our world and driving scientific progress.

You shouldn't need a permission slip to read a webpage–whether you do it with your own eyes, or use software to help. AI is a category of general-purpose tools with myriad beneficial uses. Requiring...

Read Full Article »

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. Fair Use Protections: Can developers' use of copyrighted material for training AI models be considered fair use, and if so, what are the implications for future uses?
  2. Expanding Copyright Laws: Would expanding copyright laws to protect against AI-generated content harm research, artistic expression, or job markets, and how would this impact the development of AI technology?
  3. Licensing Deals and Settlements: What role do licensing deals and settlements play in mitigating potential litigation, and are they effective in protecting developers' interests?

Summary

The launch of ChatGPT and other deep learning models has sparked a flurry of lawsuits against developers, with most centered on copyright infringement claims. Developers argue that their training processes constitute fair use, while rightsholders claim that removing or altering attribution information constitutes infringement.

Courts have dismissed some claims, citing lack of plausibility or substantial risk of harm. However, existing litigation may be an "elaborate scramble for leverage" in settlement negotiations.

A win foightsholders could undermine fair use protections and artistic freedoms, while a developer victory could set a precedent for the development of AI technology.

The launch of ChatGPT and other deep learning quickly led to a flurry of lawsuits against model developers. Legal theories vary, but most are rooted in copyright: plaintiffs argue that use of their wo...

Read Full Article »

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. Balancing Copyright Protection with Free Speech: Discuss the tension between protecting intellectual property rights and allowing for free speech and creative expression online.
  2. The Impact of Broad Copyright Laws on Small Creators: Explore how overly broad copyright laws can stifle innovation and creativity among small creators, researchers, and journalists.
  3. The Role of End User License Agreements in Shaping Online Behavior: Analyze the influence of EULAs on users' behavior and the potential consequences for free speech and transparency online.

Summary

The current state of copyright law poses a significant threat to free speech and creative expression online. The fear of financial retribution can silence would-be speakers, even if their use is deemed legitimate.

This has led to researchers being intimidated into silence, and small creators being stifleed by overly broad laws. The imbalance of power between authors and mass media owners perpetuates a system that prioritizes the interests of the powerful over those of marginalized voices.

It is essential to reconsider the draconian nature of modern copyright law and strike a balance between protecting intellectual property and preserving free speech.

If you’ve got lawyers and a copyright, the law gives you tremendous power to silence speech you don’t like. Copyright’s statutory damages can be as high as $150,000 per work infringed, even if n...

Read Full Article »
Advertisement

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. The concept of "memory-holing" is a serious threat to a free and open internet, as it allows powerful individuals and organizations to hide their past mistakes and misdeeds.r
  2. The use of copyright claims as a tool for memory-holing is particularly insidious, as it can be used to silence critics and erase embarrassing information from the public record.r
  3. The existence of archived websites, such as the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, provides a crucial counterbalance to memory-holing efforts, allowing users to access and preserve historical content.Summary r The internet's ability to store and share information has created a powerful tool for those seeking to hide their past mistakes. "Memory-holing" allows individuals and organizations to erase embarrassing information from the public record, often through copyright claims or website changes. This threatens a free and open internet, as it silences critics and erases historical context. However, archived websites like the Wayback Machine provide a counterbalance, preserving earlier versions of content and allowing users to access a more complete picture of history. Preserving this functionality is crucial for a functioning democracy and an open society.

Summary

R The internet's ability to store and share information has created a powerful tool for those seeking to hide their past mistakes. "Memory-holing" allows individuals and organizations to erase embarrassing information from the public record, often through copyright claims or website changes.

This threatens a free and open internet, as it silences critics and erases historical context. However, archived websites like the Wayback Machine provide a counterbalance, preserving earlier versions of content and allowing users to access a more complete picture of history.

Preserving this functionality is crucial for a functioning democracy and an open society.

If there is one axiom that we should want to be true about the internet, it should be: the internet never forgets. One of the advantages of our advancing technology is that information can be stored a...

Read Full Article »