Summary

:A new report from Amnesty International details how a zero-day exploit developed by Cellebrite was used to unlock an Android phone belonging to a Serbian youth activist. The exploit targeted Android USB drivers, highlighting the vulnerability of devices to sophisticated attacks.

This raises concerns about mass surveillance and censorship, as well as the protection of human rights for activists and journalists. International organizations must take steps to ensure the safety and security of those who speak out against injustice, while also addressing the root causes of such exploitation.

The use of such exploits demands a global response.

Summary

The use of stalkerware is a concerning trend that violates individual privacy and puts personal data at risk. Installing spyware on someone's device without their knowledge or consent is not only unethical but also potentially illegal.

This practice can lead to severe consequences, including damage to relationships and mental health. As technology advances, it is essential to prioritize user security and respect for personal boundaries.

Laws and regulations must be enforced to protect individuals from such invasive measures, ensuring a safer and more respectful digital environment.

Summary

EFF will be attending RightsCon in Taipei, Taiwan from 24-27 February. Several members, including director-level staff and experts, will participate in sessions, panels, and networking opportunities.

The EFF delegation includes individuals leading sessions on platform accountability, digital rights defenders, and human rights challenges. They will connect with attendees, particularly at the following sessions: "Mutual Support" and "Platform Accountability in Crisis".

These events aim to foster dialogue, learn from Taiwan's tech community, and contribute to the global conversation on pressing issues. EFF hopes to engage with attendees and support the global dialogue on digital human rights challenges.

Summary

EFF is working to expand its efforts in Europe to promote digital rights and fight online harms. The organization's mission is to ensure that technology supports freedom, justice, and innovation for all people worldwide.

EFF is highlighting the need to reduce data collection and processing by corporations, strengthening GDPR enforcement, and promoting a "privacy first" approach. However, age verification tools have raised concerns about free speech and individual rights, particularly in the UK's Online Safety Act.

EFF must balance these competing interests and ensure effective regulation that respects human rights while preventing online harms.

Summary

In March 2024, KrebsOnSecurity exposed the Onerep founder's involvement with numerous people-search companies. In response, Mozilla announced it would stop bundling Onerep with Firefox and wind down its partnership.

However, nearly a year later, Mozilla continues to promote Onerep to users. This raises questions about the company's commitment to user privacy and online security.Mozilla's inaction is particularly concerning given its reputation as a champion of digital rights.

The incident highlights the need for increased transparency and accountability among tech companies. Regulators must also step up their efforts to hold these organizations accountable for their data handling practices.Users deserve better.

Mozilla must take immediate action to rectify this situation and prioritize their online security and privacy.

Summary

The TAKE IT DOWN Act has raised concerns about its potential to speed up the removal of non-consensual intimate imagery online, but at the cost of threatening free expression and user privacy. The bill's notice-and-takedown system could lead to overreach and censorship, particularly with broad definitions and lack of safeguards.

Exemptions for encrypted services are also unclear, posing a threat to private conversations and end-to-end encryption. Critics argue that the bill does not adequately address the problem it claims to solve and would instead create a far broader internet censorship regime than existing laws like the DMCA.

Summary

Digital security training can feel overwhelming, but a community-oriented approach can make it more manageable. By exploring questions around what to protect, who to protect it from, and how much trouble to go through, we can make informed decisions about our online situation.

Using secure messaging services like Signal or Facebook Messenger's end-to-end encryption is essential for protecting private communication. However, recognizing the limitations of certain platforms and being willing to switch to more secure options is crucial.

Building a support system of allies and resources can also help individuals navigate complex online issues and maintain online security.

Summary

The European Commission has been ordered to pay damages to a user for violating its own data protection regulations. This case highlights the principle that individuals have the right to seek compensation when their personal data is lost, stolen, or shared without safeguards.

The decision underscores the importance of accountability for corporations and institutions that fail to protect user data. The European General Court found that the EC violated EU privacy protections by facilitating the transfer of a citizen's IP address and other personal data to Meta.

This case may serve as a precedent for users and lawmakers in otheegions.

Summary

The 2024 state legislative session saw significant developments in digital rights, with seven states adopting comprehensive privacy laws. Maryland's new law sets a strong standard, but EFF urges stronger bills moving forward.

A key issue remains the debate over private right of action, which would allow individuals to sue companies for privacy violations. Without this enforcement mechanism, consumers are left vulnerable and powerless.

States are expected to continue enacting privacy laws based on flawed models, highlighting the need for effective solutions to ensure robust consumer protections. Issue-specific laws covering sensitive data types may be necessary to fill federal gaps.

Summary

The EFF highlights the growing importance of state governments in tech policy, as they increasingly drive legislation on issues like biometric data regulation, AI use, and online child safety. The 2024 report by NYU's Center on Technology Policy reveals a historic year for state tech policy, with a significant increase in bills passed across 46 states.

Trifecta governments, where one party controls all branches of state government, have played a majoole in pushing through these regulations. As the federal government lags behind, civil liberties groups like EFF urge caution and advocacy to ensure that individual rights are protected in the face of rapidly evolving tech landscapes.