Key Points

• r 1. The use of zero-day exploits to target Android phones raises significant concerns about government or corporate surveillance of individuals exercising their right to free speech and assembly.r 2. The fact that Cellebrite, a company specializing in digital forensics and law enforcement tools, has developed such an exploit highlights the blurred lines between legitimate investigative powers and malicious misuse of technology.r 3. How can international organizations like Amnesty International and governments work together to prevent the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities for mass surveillance and protect the rights of individuals to privacy and security.Summary r A new report from Amnesty International reveals that a 23-year-old Serbian youth activist had their Android phone unlocked by a zero-day exploit developed by Cellebrite. The exploit targeted Android USB drivers, demonstrating the sophistication and potentially malicious use of technology for surveillance. This incident highlights the risks faced by individuals exercising their right to free speech and assembly. As companies like Cellebrite develop such exploits, international cooperation is necessary to prevent their misuse and ensure that digital rights are protected. The incident underscores the need for stricter regulations on the development and use of zero-day vulnerabilities.