EFF does a lot of things, including impact litigation, legislative lobbying, and technology development, all to fight for your civil liberties in the digital age. With litigation, we directly represen...
Read Full Article »The Judicial Conference Should Continue to Liberally Allow Amicus Briefs, a Critical Advocacy Tool
Discussion Points
- The impact of proposed rule changes on the filing of amicus briefs in circuit courts and their potential effects on EFF's legal work.
- The role of amicus briefs in providing a helpful outside perspective on cases and the value they bring to court decisions.
- The potential consequences of disfavoring amicus briefs that address issues already mentioned by the parties, and how this may limit access to important perspectives.
Summary
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is concerned about proposed changes to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 that would make it harder to file amicus briefs in circuit courts. These briefs are a core part of EFF's legal work, providing valuable outside perspectives on cases and contributing to informed court decisions.
Two proposed changes are particularly concerning: disfavoring amicus briefs that address issues already mentioned by the parties, and reducing the amount and types of such briefs filed. EFF has submitted comments opposing these changes, highlighting their potential impact on access to important perspectives and the integrity of the judicial process.