The rivalry between Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex CLI has sparked concerns among developers. While both tools are considered "agentic" in nature, the approaches to licensing and access control differ significantly. Anthropic's decision to issue takedown notices to a developer attempting to reverse-engineer Claude Code has raised eyebrows. The usage license for this tool is more restrictive than OpenAI's, leading to accusations of stifling innovation and collaboration. In contrast, Codex CLI appears to be fostering goodwill among developers. Its more permissive approach may contribute to its reputation as a more open and trustworthy AI development platform. As the competition between these coding tools intensifies, it is essential to consider the implications for the broader AI research community.