Articles Tagged: technology development

Showing 2 of 2 articles tagged with "technology development"

Advertisement

Discussion Points

  1. r
  2. National Security vs. Individual Rights: How should governments balance their need for national security with individual citizens' right to privacy, particularly when it comes to using exploit chains like the one allegedly used by Serbian authorities?r
  3. Dark Tech and Cybersecurity: What implications do zero-day exploits have on cybersecurity, and how can companies and individuals protect themselves against such vulnerabilities?r
  4. Accountability and Transparency: In cases where law enforcement or authorities use exploit chains to gain unauthorized access to devices, who should be held accountable and what measures can be taken to ensure transparency and oversight?

Summary

R Serbian authorities have reportedly employed an Android zero-day exploit chain developed by Cellebrite to unlock the device of a student activist, with the intention of installing spyware. This incident raises significant concerns regarding national security, individual rights, and the use of dark tech in cybersecurity.

The exploitation of vulnerabilities highlights the need for transparency and accountability in law enforcement practices, as well as robust protection measures against such vulnerabilities. International cooperation and standardization are essential to preventing similar incidents and ensuring that authorities prioritize both security and individual freedoms.

Governments must reassess theieliance on exploit chains.

Serbian authorities have reportedly used an Android zero-day exploit chain developed by Cellebrite to unlock the device of a student activist in the country and attempt to install spyware. [...]...

Read Full Article »

Discussion Points

  1. The impact of proposed rule changes on the filing of amicus briefs in circuit courts and their potential effects on EFF's legal work.
  2. The role of amicus briefs in providing a helpful outside perspective on cases and the value they bring to court decisions.
  3. The potential consequences of disfavoring amicus briefs that address issues already mentioned by the parties, and how this may limit access to important perspectives.

Summary

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is concerned about proposed changes to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 that would make it harder to file amicus briefs in circuit courts. These briefs are a core part of EFF's legal work, providing valuable outside perspectives on cases and contributing to informed court decisions.

Two proposed changes are particularly concerning: disfavoring amicus briefs that address issues already mentioned by the parties, and reducing the amount and types of such briefs filed. EFF has submitted comments opposing these changes, highlighting their potential impact on access to important perspectives and the integrity of the judicial process.

EFF does a lot of things, including impact litigation, legislative lobbying, and technology development, all to fight for your civil liberties in the digital age. With litigation, we directly represen...

Read Full Article »