Articles Tagged: civil liberties

Showing 4 of 4 articles tagged with "civil liberties"

Advertisement

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. Balancing Public Safety with Individual Privacy: How do you think Flock Safety's automated license plate readers (ALPRs) balance the need for law enforcement agencies to track and prevent crimes with the concern over individual privacy and the potential for mass surveillance?r
  2. The Role of Grassroots Activism in Holding Corporations Accountable: What role do grassroots initiatives like DeFlock.me play in holding companies like Flock Safety accountable for their actions, particularly when it comes to issues of privacy and intellectual property?r
  3. The Intersection of Technology and Civil Liberties: How do emerging technologies like ALPRs impact our civil liberties, and what steps can be taken to ensure that these technologies are developed and used in ways that respect individual rights and freedoms?

Summary

Flock Safety, a company providing automated license plate readers (ALPRs) to law enforcement agencies, is clashing with a privacy activist over the mapping of its camera locations. The company sent a cease-and-desist letter, claiming trademark dilution, but EFF rejected the demand, citing First Amendment rights.

DeFlock.me, a crowdsourced project, has mapped over 16,000 ALPR locations, including Flock Safety devices, raising concerns about mass surveillance and potential misuse by law enforcement. The case highlights the tension between public safety and individual privacy, as well as the importance of grassroots activism in holding corporations accountable for their actions.

Flock Safety loves to crow about the thousands of local law enforcement agencies around the United States that have adopted its avian-themed automated license plate readers (ALPRs). But when a privacy...

Read Full Article »

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. The impact of proposed rule changes on the filing of amicus briefs in circuit courts and their potential effects on EFF's legal work.
  2. The role of amicus briefs in providing a helpful outside perspective on cases and the value they bring to court decisions.
  3. The potential consequences of disfavoring amicus briefs that address issues already mentioned by the parties, and how this may limit access to important perspectives.

Summary

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is concerned about proposed changes to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 that would make it harder to file amicus briefs in circuit courts. These briefs are a core part of EFF's legal work, providing valuable outside perspectives on cases and contributing to informed court decisions.

Two proposed changes are particularly concerning: disfavoring amicus briefs that address issues already mentioned by the parties, and reducing the amount and types of such briefs filed. EFF has submitted comments opposing these changes, highlighting their potential impact on access to important perspectives and the integrity of the judicial process.

EFF does a lot of things, including impact litigation, legislative lobbying, and technology development, all to fight for your civil liberties in the digital age. With litigation, we directly represen...

Read Full Article »

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. The Rise of State Governments in Tech Policy: How is the increasing involvement of state governments in tech policy affecting civil liberties and individual rights? What are the implications of this shift on the federal government's role in regulating technology?
  2. The Impact of Partisan Control on Tech Regulations: How does the presence of "trifecta" governments, where one party controls both chambers of the legislature and the governorship, influence the passage of tech-related bills? Is this a positive or negative development for civil liberties?
  3. Global Implications of State-Level Tech Policy: As state governments in various countries begin to take a more active role in regulating technology, how might this impact international cooperation and conflict on issues related to online governance and digital rights?

Summary

The EFF highlights the growing importance of state governments in tech policy, as they increasingly drive legislation on issues like biometric data regulation, AI use, and online child safety. The 2024 report by NYU's Center on Technology Policy reveals a historic year for state tech policy, with a significant increase in bills passed across 46 states.

Trifecta governments, where one party controls all branches of state government, have played a majoole in pushing through these regulations. As the federal government lags behind, civil liberties groups like EFF urge caution and advocacy to ensure that individual rights are protected in the face of rapidly evolving tech landscapes.

EFF has been at the forefront of defending civil liberties in the digital age, with our activism team working across state, federal, and local levels to safeguard everyone's rights in the rapidly evol...

Read Full Article »
Advertisement

Deeplinks on in internet

Discussion Points

  1. Balancing Copyright Protection with Free Speech: Discuss the tension between protecting intellectual property rights and allowing for free speech and creative expression online.
  2. The Impact of Broad Copyright Laws on Small Creators: Explore how overly broad copyright laws can stifle innovation and creativity among small creators, researchers, and journalists.
  3. The Role of End User License Agreements in Shaping Online Behavior: Analyze the influence of EULAs on users' behavior and the potential consequences for free speech and transparency online.

Summary

The current state of copyright law poses a significant threat to free speech and creative expression online. The fear of financial retribution can silence would-be speakers, even if their use is deemed legitimate.

This has led to researchers being intimidated into silence, and small creators being stifleed by overly broad laws. The imbalance of power between authors and mass media owners perpetuates a system that prioritizes the interests of the powerful over those of marginalized voices.

It is essential to reconsider the draconian nature of modern copyright law and strike a balance between protecting intellectual property and preserving free speech.

If you’ve got lawyers and a copyright, the law gives you tremendous power to silence speech you don’t like. Copyright’s statutory damages can be as high as $150,000 per work infringed, even if n...

Read Full Article »