The development of a safer and more resilient landscape for defenders requires addressing the shortcomings of current naming conventions. Inefficiencies in these systems can lead to confusion, errors, and vulnerabilities. By identifying and mitigating these issues, we can create a more cohesive and effective framework. This involves striking a balance between standardization and creativity, ensuring inclusivity and accessibility, and navigating the complexities of evolving versus maintaining legacy systems. Only through a thorough examination and revision of current naming conventions can we unlock a safer, more resilient, and more supportive environment for all defenders.