Apple Accused of Misleading Consumers With 'Carbon Neutral' Claims

AI Analysis

Apple is facing a lawsuit alleging that its "carbon neutral" claims for the Apple Watch Series 9, SE, and Ultra 2 are misleading. The plaintiffs argue that the company's reliance on carbon offset projects that failed to meet criteria for genuine carbon reductions led to false marketing claims. The case centers on two such projects in Kenya and China, which were already protected or heavily forested before Apple's involvement. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and an injunction to prevent Apple from marketing the affected products as carbon neutral.

Key Points

  • r 1. Environmental Misrepresentation: Is Apple's claim of carbon neutrality a legitimate environmental initiative, or is it misleading consumers? How can companies ensure the accuracy of their sustainability claims?r 2. Carbon Offset Projects: What are the limitations and flaws in carbon offset projects like the Kenya's Chyulu Hills Project and China's Guinan Project? Can these projects truly provide genuine carbon reductions?r 3. Consumer Influence on Environmental Decisions: To what extent do consumers influence companies' environmental initiatives, and can businesses effectively market their sustainability efforts to their target audience?r

Original Article

Apple is facing a new lawsuit from consumers who allege that its claim that the Apple Watch Series 9, SE, and Ultra 2 are "carbon neutral" is misleading, Reuters reports.


Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the lawsuit argues that Apple misrepresented the environmental impact of these three Apple Watch models by relying on carbon offset projects that did not provide genuine carbon reductions. The plaintiffs claim they would not have bought their devices or would have paid less had they known this.

The complaint centers on two carbon offset projects Apple uses to support its carbon neutrality efforts: Kenya's Chyulu Hills Project and China's Guinan Project. According to the lawsuit, both projects fail to meet the criteria for additional carbon reduction because the land in question was already protected or heavily forested before Apple's involvement.

In both cases, the carbon reductions would have occurred regardless of Apple's involvement or the projects' existence. Because Apple's carbon neutrality claims are predicated on the efficacy and legitimacy of these projects, Apple's carbon neutrality claims are false and misleading.


The plaintiffs argue that because these locations were already managed under conservation protections for several decades or naturally heavily forested, Apple's financial support did not lead to a reduction in carbon emissions beyond what would have occurred naturally.

Apple introduced the first carbon-neutral Apple Watch models in September 2023 as part of its broader environmental initiatives. The marketing materials and packaging included a new green "carbon neutral" label. The company has set a goal of making its entire business carbon neutral by 2030.

The plaintiffs cite a study by the National Retail Federation and IBM, stating that 70% of U.S. and Canadian consumers consider environmental sustainability an important factor in purchasing decisions. Unspecified damages and an injunction to prevent Apple from marketing the Apple Watch Series 9, SE, and Ultra 2 as carbon neutral are being sought.
Related Forum: Apple Watch

This article, "Apple Accused of Misleading Consumers With 'Carbon Neutral' Claims" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

Share This Article

Hashtags for Sharing

Comments