The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has long been criticized for its role in regulating the nuclear industry. Critics argue that excessive regulations and lengthy authorization timelines stifle innovation, hindering progress in the field. However, this stance overlooks the potential risks associated with handing oveegulatory responsibilities to states.States may not possess the necessary expertise oesources to enforce robust safety standards, which could undermine public trust and lead to safety concerns. The industry's own history has shown that self-regulation is often insufficient to guarantee safety.In conclusion, striking a balance between innovation and safety regulations is crucial. While delegating some responsibilities to states may seem like an attractive option, it raises significant concerns about the potential consequences for public safety and trust in the industry.