The decision to gut USAID has severe and far-reaching consequences, particularly in crisis zones where life-saving interventions are desperately needed. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the absence of expert teams has already led to delayed diagnosis and treatment of deadly diseases.The humanitarian implications are dire, with vulnerable populations bearing the brunt of the shortage. Communities that rely on USAID's services for basic necessities like healthcare and clean water are being left to fend for themselves, exacerbating existing inequalities.It is imperative that we explore alternative solutions that prioritize emergency response and community resilience. This can involve re-evaluating funding allocations, leveraging private sector partnerships, and bolstering local capacity to ensure that those who need it most receive the support they require.